暖通空调>期刊目次>2025年>第9期

建筑动态生命周期评估方法与工具研究进展和应用展望

Progress and application prospects of methods and tools fordynamic life cycle assessment of buildings

闫浩春[1][2] 孙沛然[1][2] 韩晓莉[1][2] 胡建丽[3]
[1]中国建筑材料科学研究总院有限公司,北京;[2]中国国检测试控股集团股份有限公司,北京;[3]中国建筑设计研究院有限公司,北京

摘要:

建筑动态生命周期评估(DLCA)属于新兴研究课题,缺乏代表性方法和工具的系统梳理。为了帮助从业者更好地了解和应用,通过系统文献综述的方法搜集了2010年至2024年8月的中英文文献,发现该领域在欧洲、亚洲、北美洲已逐渐受到关注。现有方法可以概括为4种:动态矩阵法、改进的动态矩阵法、动态生命周期成本法和简化的DLCA方法;有发展前景的软件工具为:DyPLCA、Temporalis、VERIFY、premise、Futura;数据库修改工具普遍存在建模方法与通用数据库对应生命周期清单不匹配的问题。在完全动态生命周期评估方法中,改进的动态矩阵法和运用DyPLCA工具的方法理论发展较成熟,简化动态生命周期评估方法更适合应用。为实现方法的规范化应用,应逐步制定新标准:描述出基于公历的时间范围、引入适当的取舍规则;应通过进一步研究识别时间敏感数据的方法,以及收集实时监测数据、修改数据库格式的手段,提高数据的可获取性。

关键词:动态生命周期评估(DLCA);时间变化;环境影响;建筑;可持续发展;动态矩阵法;动态生命周期成本法

Abstract:

Dynamic life cycle assessment (DLCA) of buildings is an emerging research topic, which lacks systematic analysis of representative methods and tools. In order to help practitioners better understand and apply, literature in English and Chinese from 2010 to August 2024 is collected through a systematic literature review approach, and it is found that the field is gaining attention in Europe, Asia and North America. The existing methods can be summarized into four types: dynamic matrix method, improved dynamic matrix method, dynamic life cycle cost method and simplified DLCA method, and the promising software tools are DyPLCA, Temporalis, VERIFY, premise, and Futura. The database modification tools generally have the problem of mismatch between the modeling method and the corresponding life cycle inventory (LCI) of the common database. In the fully DLCA methods, the improved dynamic matrix method and the method of applying the DyPLCA tools are more mature in terms of theoretical development of the methods, and the simplified DLCA method is more suitable for application. In order to achieve a standardized application of the methodology, new standards should be developed step by step: a calendar-based time range should be described and appropriate rounding rules should be introduced, and data accessibility should be improved through research into methods of identifying time-sensitive data, as well as the collection of real-time monitoring data and the modification of database formats.

Keywords:dynamic life cycle assessment (DLCA); temporal variation; environmental impact; building; sustainable development; dynamic matrix method; dynamic life cycle cost method

    你还没注册?或者没有登录?这篇期刊要求至少是本站的注册会员才能阅读!

    如果你还没注册,请赶紧点此注册吧!

    如果你已经注册但还没登录,请赶紧点此登录吧!