工业余热供暖可持续运营模式与激励机制研究及案例分析*
摘要:
针对工业余热供暖项目中利益相关方多、利益协调复杂导致的项目落地与推广困难等问题,构建了一种工业余热供暖中流程工业企业、热电厂、供热公司三方非合作博弈模型,量化解析了工业余热供暖中技术参数与市场机制的交互作用,提出了各方的最优定价策略与利益协调机制。并按照余热品质差异,建立了3种工业余热供暖可持续运营模式:直接供热模式、协同补热模式和强化补热模式。其中,直接供热模式为余热无需补热、直接供出,这种模式设备系统与运维管理均最为简单;协同补热模式为余热补热后供出并由供热公司承担再加热费用,是兼顾余热回收量与协调多方利益的有效策略;强化补热模式同样为余热补热后再供出,但需多方共担再加热费并配套了一定的财政补贴政策。案例分析结果发现3种模式下不同费用分担方式会影响各方利益与参与积极性。本文为工业余热供暖项目中的企业决策与政府政策设计提供了切实、可操作的决策框架。
Abstract:
In view of the difficulties in project implementation and promotion caused by multiple stakeholders and complex interest coordination in industrial waste heat heating projects, this paper constructs a non-cooperative game model involving three parties—process industrial enterprises, thermal power plants, and heating companies in industrial waste heat heating. It quantitatively analyses the interaction between technical parameters and market mechanisms in industrial waste heat heating, and proposes optimal pricing strategies and interest coordination mechanisms for each party. Based on the differences in waste heat quality, three sustainable operation modes for industrial waste heat heating are established: the direct heating mode, the collaborative supplementary heating mode, and the enhanced supplementary heating mode. Among them, the direct heating mode involves direct heating without supplementary heat, where the equipment system and operation and maintenance management are the simplest. The collaborative supplementary heating mode involves heating after supplementary heat, with the heating company bearing the reheating costs, representing an effective strategy that balances waste heat recovery and coordinates the interests of multiple parties. The enhanced supplementary heating mode also involves heating after supplementary heat, but requires multiple parties to share the reheating costs and is supported by certain financial subsidy policies. The case analysis results reveal that different cost-sharing methods under the three modes affect the interests and participation enthusiasm of each party. This paper provides a practical and operable decision-making framework for enterprise decision-making and government policy design in industrial waste heat heating projects.
Keywords:heating; industrial waste heat; waste heat utilization; game theory; heating market; pricing mechanism; operation mode


